May’s attorney shared information from Yul Edochie’s defense, where he claimed that he was merely acting skits with Judy, and they were never married. Mr. Ugwuonye, who is representing May in her divorce case with Yul, sent a divorce petition to Yul on behalf of his client. Yul denied the allegations of a traditional marriage between himself and Judy and instead claimed that they were only skit makers like Sabinus.
May Edochie initially wanted to take legal action against Yul for bigamy, which is the act of marrying another wife without her knowledge, a serious crime under the law. After learning that Yul could be remanded in jail for such an offense, she chose to file for divorce and also sued Judy on the grounds of adultery.
Yul further claimed that his alleged marriage to Judy was a lie propagated by the blog Gistlover to ruin him for social media traffic and financial gains. May’s attorney noted that the skit making between the two has resulted in the birth of two children, and they are currently expecting a third.
The allegation by May Edochie against Yul and Judy and their response below;
“MAY: Petition (10) xviii.
The Respondent (Yul) left Lagos for Enugu the following day, 21st ofApril, 2022, a Thursday and on Sunday, the 24h of April, 2022, the Petitioner found out again on social media (Gistlover Blog) that the Respondent was performing traditional marriage rites with the Party Cited (Judy) in her home town in Anambra State as at when the information was posted. (The Petitioner shall rely on the said publication at the trial of this suit.
YUL’S RESPONSE:
The Respondent (Yul) categorically denies paragraph 10 (xviii) of the petition and states that the said Gistlover blog publication was false and fuelled by gistlover’s enterprise in fake news and chaos.
That since the news of the birth of the Respondent’s child with the Co-Respondent in June 2021, Gistlover as a negative blog that thrive in fake and manipulated information for financial gains has been negatively exploiting every movie or skit featuring the Respondent & Co-Respondent and generating social media traffic for financial benefits therefrom. The Respondent hereby puts the Petitioner to the strictest proofthereof.
JUDY’S RESPONSE:
9.The Co-Respondent (Judy) categorically denies paragraph 10 (xviii) &(xix) of the petition and states that the said Gistlover blog nevicationas. There was no traditional mariage ceremony between the Respondent and the Co-Respondent (Yul and Judy) on the 24th day of April 2022 or any other date whatsoever. The Co-Respondent hereby puts the Petitioner to the strictest proof thereof.”
See the post below
